Skip to main content

RAJ test....what we don't know about it ?


The following is a brief description of the Raj test: when nerve stimulation is being used to locate a nerve, a twitch is observed when the needle tip is close to the neural target. Ideally, the twitch is required to persist at a current of 0.5 mA. The clinician then injects a small volume of local anesthetic or normal saline through the needle. If the needle tip is in the correct location, the muscle twitch immediately disappears.

Until very recently the disappearance of the twitch was thought to be caused by physical displacement of the nerve by the injectate.

We recently learned that this mechanism is best explained in electrical terms and is not entirely a result of the physical dis- placement of the nerve.In a porcine model, the injection of 0.9% sodium chloride solution (NaCl) abolished the motor response, and a subsequent injection of 5% dextrose reestablished a motor response during peripheral nerve stimulation.

An accompanying in vitro experiment showed that injections of solutions, such as 0.9% NaCl, cause a change in the electrical field at the needle tissue interface. 

It was concluded that the injection of electrically conducting solutions (saline or local anesthetic) increases the conductive area surrounding the stimulating needle tip, leading to a decrease in the current density surrounding the target nerve. The current density surround- ing the needle tip is then no longer sufficient to stimulate the desired nerve.This observation suggests that effective nerve stimulation is sensitive to changes that occur at the needle tissue interface, such as the angle of the needle or the injection of the local anesthetic. The net effect of these changes is to alter the current density at the tip of the needle or the path of the electric current, ultimately resulting in a change in the quality of the motor response.

Next part in the next post....


 
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters

Clinical experience with power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters in intensive care patients     Introduction In intensive care units (ICU), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) may be an alternative option to standard central venous catheters, particularly in patients with coagulation disorders or at high risk for infection. Some limits of PICCs (such as low flow rates) may be overcome by the use of power-injectable catheters . Method We have retrospectively reviewed all the power injectable PICCs inserted in adult and pediatric patients in the ICU during a 12-month period, focusing on the rate of complications at insertion and during maintenance. Results We have collected 89 power injectable PICCs (in adults and in children), both multiple and single lumen. All insertions were successful. There were no major complications at insertion and no episodes of catheter-related blood stream infection. Non-infective complications ...

Things to Avoid in Anesthesia for Pregnant with Pulmonary hypertension

Anesthesia for Pregnant woman with Pulmonary Hypertension is a real challenge for anesthesiologist. It is very crucial to remember the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in pregnant women and to avoid some practices that will worsen the cardiac status. 1-Avoid single shot spinal anesthesia. Some authorities consider pulmonary hypertension as absolute contraindication for single shot spinal anesthesia specially in patients with NYHA III ,IV. Spinal anesthesia causes major hemodynamic instability(decrease SVR, decrease VR, decrease in CO) The preferred neuroaxial techniques are (epidural anesthesia and CSE with minimal spinal dose) 2-Avoid PAC. Pulmonary Artery catheters insertion may lead to pulmonary artery rupture or thrombosis. TEE is better cardiac monitor/Arteial line is mandatory. 3-Avoid Nitrous oxide in gas mixture.N2O increase the PVR 4-If MV to be started, avoid High TV and PEEP 5-Avoid Oxytocin Boluses, or rapid administration of Pitocin. Oxytocin causes ...

The 12 decision making steps for post dural puncture headache treatment

Treatment decision-making algorithm for postdural puncture headache. 1. When diagnosis is made, all patients should receive supportive measures (reassurance, bed rest, analgesics, hydration, quiet environment). 2. Severity of symptoms should be classified using VAS scale (mild 1–3, moderate 4–6, severe 7–10). 3. Virtually all patients will improve in time even without additional therapy. (dashed lines) 4. Symptoms worsen or fail to resolve within 5 days. 5. Patient preference dictates the choice between pharmacologic (less effective) and epidural blood patch (EBP). 6. In patients with severe symptoms, EBP is strongly suggested. 7. The most common pharmacologic measure is  caffeine  prescription. 8. The failure, worsening, or recurrence of symptoms after pharmacologic measures favors the use of EBP. 9. In addition to EBP, other epidural treatment options can be considered in select patients (eg,  dextran , saline). 10. A period of 24 h should lapse before repeating EBP. 11...