Skip to main content

Central line...bubble it


One of the more serious complications of central venous catheter (CVC) placement involves arterial puncture and cannullation with a large caliber dialator and catheter.  This occurs in up to 5% of all CVC placement attempts.  

Depending on the location of  CVC placement, inadvertent arterial placement may lead to bleeding, embolism, neurologic injury, airway loss and even death.  Verifying venous placement prior to dilatation, cannulation and infusion of vasoactive agents is essential.
One method of doing so in situations where placement is equivocal by standard methods is with the less-publicized but highly useful bedside echocardiography bubble test.
In order to employ this method during CVC placement, after the target vessel has been entered with the finder needle, insert the finder needle catheter.  Have an assistant place the echo probe in a subcostal position.  Through the finder needle catheter rapidly flush 10cc sterile saline (both agitated and non-agitated have been shown to work).  If the catheter is in the venous system, the right atrium and right ventricle will opacify almost immediately on echo.  If the catheter is in the arterial system, there will be a delay, and then the left atrium and left ventricle will be noted to opacify.
This method can help differentiate between arterial and venous cannulations prior to dilatation and placement of large bore catheters.  It can also be used once a catheter has been placed, to confirm venous placement.  By doing so the user to may confidently identify venous catheter placement prior to chest x-ray.  




Blaivas M.  “Video analysis of accidental arterial cannulation with dynamic ultrasound guidance for central venous access.”  J Ultrasound Med 2009;28:1239-44.
Ghadiali N, Teo LM, Sheah K.  “Bedside confirmation of a persistent left superior vena cava based on aberrantly positioned central venous catheter on chest radiograph.” Br J Anaesth 2006;96:53–6.
Prekker ME, Chang R, Cole JB, Reardon R.  “Rapid confirmation of central venous catheter placement using an ultrasonographic "Bubble Test.” Acad Emerg Med 2010;17(7):e85-6.




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Things to Avoid in Anesthesia for Pregnant with Pulmonary hypertension

Anesthesia for Pregnant woman with Pulmonary Hypertension is a real challenge for anesthesiologist. It is very crucial to remember the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in pregnant women and to avoid some practices that will worsen the cardiac status. 1-Avoid single shot spinal anesthesia. Some authorities consider pulmonary hypertension as absolute contraindication for single shot spinal anesthesia specially in patients with NYHA III ,IV. Spinal anesthesia causes major hemodynamic instability(decrease SVR, decrease VR, decrease in CO) The preferred neuroaxial techniques are (epidural anesthesia and CSE with minimal spinal dose) 2-Avoid PAC. Pulmonary Artery catheters insertion may lead to pulmonary artery rupture or thrombosis. TEE is better cardiac monitor/Arteial line is mandatory. 3-Avoid Nitrous oxide in gas mixture.N2O increase the PVR 4-If MV to be started, avoid High TV and PEEP 5-Avoid Oxytocin Boluses, or rapid administration of Pitocin. Oxytocin causes ...
Post a Comment
Read more

power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters

Clinical experience with power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters in intensive care patients     Introduction In intensive care units (ICU), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) may be an alternative option to standard central venous catheters, particularly in patients with coagulation disorders or at high risk for infection. Some limits of PICCs (such as low flow rates) may be overcome by the use of power-injectable catheters . Method We have retrospectively reviewed all the power injectable PICCs inserted in adult and pediatric patients in the ICU during a 12-month period, focusing on the rate of complications at insertion and during maintenance. Results We have collected 89 power injectable PICCs (in adults and in children), both multiple and single lumen. All insertions were successful. There were no major complications at insertion and no episodes of catheter-related blood stream infection. Non-infective complications ...
1 comment
Read more

Lumbar and thoracic epidural in Pediatrics-Technical aspect

The midline approach is most commonly used. The ligamentum   flavum is considerably thinner and less dense in infants than in older children and adults. This makes recognition of engagement in the ligament more difficult and requires both extra care and slower, more deliberate passage of the needle to avoid subarachnoid puncture. The angle of approach to the epidural space is slightly more perpendicular to the plane of the back than in older children and adults, owing to the orientation of the spinous   processes in infants and small children. The loss of resistance technique should be used, but only with saline, not air. There are several reports of venous air embolism in infants and children when air was used to test for loss of resistance Use a short (5 cm) 18-gauge Tuohy needle and a 20- or 21-gauge catheter in infants and children. Epidural kits specifically for infants and children are available Maximum of 0.4 mg/kg/hr of bupivacaine after the initial block is estab...
Post a Comment
Read more