Skip to main content

Pre-optimisation of surgical patients.


There have been a number of publications looking at the pre-operative optimisation of oxygen delivery for high risk patients. They are based on studies showing that high-risk patients surviving major surgery achieved consistently higher postoperatrive oxygen delivery and cardiac index compared with non-survivors.

Shoemaker showed the following values to be associated with survival:
Cardiac Idex (CI)                    4.5 l/min/m2
Oxygen delivery (DO2)            600 ml/min/m2
Oxygen consumption (VO2)     170 ml/min/m2

Shoemaker et al. in 1987 and Boyd et al. in 1993 showed that producing supranormal values of oxygen delivery(>600 ml/min/m2) resulted in a reduction in pot-operative mortality in high risk surgical patients.

A paper in Critical Care Medicine in 2000 (prospective, randomized controlled trial of 412 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery in 13 hospitals from 6 European countries) compared the effects on morbidity/mortality of dopexamine infusion or placebo on fluid resuscitated patients. Patients were taken to ICU pre-operatively, invasive monitoring inserted and fluids given until set criteria met. Randomization to dopexamine 0.5 mcg/kg/min, 2 mcg/kg/min or placebo followed. There was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality in the three groups, although the authors speculated a trend towards lower mortality in the low-dose dopexamine group.

Consensus meeting: management of the high-risk surgical patient, April 2000
-Increasing global oxygen delivery in high risk patients significantly reduces mortality.
-In patients with significant IHD, care needs to be taken to minimize oxygen demand.
-The earlier the intervention, the better the outcome.
-Strategy should be as defined by shoemaker's criteria for CI, DO2, and VO2.
-Low dose dopexamine may have additional benefits.

A meta-analysis of fluid optimization by Kern and Shoemaker in Critical Care Medicine in 2002 concluded that patients at high risk (predicted mortality >20%) would benefit from fluid optimization but not those with a predicted mortality <15%.

On the flip side of the coin, excessive fluid resuscitation has been shown to worsen outcome in abdominal surgery (Brandstrup et al. 2003)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 100 essentials in icu and anesthesia

The most visual experience in anesthesia and critical care education  The 100 essentials of anesthesia and critical care  COMING VERY SOON  stay tuned 

Driving Pressure in ARDS: A new concept!

Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Marcelo B.P. Amato, M.D., Maureen O. Meade, M.D., Arthur S. Slutsky, M.D., Laurent Brochard, M.D., Eduardo L.V. Costa, M.D., David A. Schoenfeld, Ph.D., Thomas E. Stewart, M.D., Matthias Briel, M.D., Daniel Talmor, M.D., M.P.H., Alain Mercat, M.D., Jean-Christophe M. Richard, M.D., Carlos R.R. Carvalho, M.D., and Roy G. Brower, M.D. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:747-755 February 19, 2015 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639 BACKGROUND Mechanical-ventilation strategies that use lower end-inspiratory (plateau) airway pressures, lower tidal volumes (V T ), and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs) can improve survival in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the relative importance of each of these components is uncertain. Because respiratory-system compliance (C RS ) is strongly related to the volume of aerated remaining functional lung during disease (termed functional lung size)...