Skip to main content

SVV, PPV and SOS






Many clinical studies have demonstrated that the arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV) and the stroke volume variation (SVV) are accurate predictors of fluid responsiveness.



A recent meta-analysis showed that the average sensitivity and specificity of these two parameters is 85%, which is indeed not perfect, but quite impressive when compared with all other clinical indicators.


However, these dynamic parameters have limitations precluding their use in several clinical situations.

The main limitations to the use of dynamic parameters in surgical patients have been recently summarized as ‘SOS’.


The first ‘S’ stands for small tidal volume and spontaneous breathing activity; the ‘O’ stands for open chest.



In these conditions, changes in intrathoracic pressure are usually too small to induce significant changes in venous return. As a result, a false-negative may be observed, that is a small PPV or SVV in fluid responders. Several clinical studies have confirmed that the predictive value of PPV and SVV is decreased when

  • patients are breathing spontaneously,
  • when they are mechanically ventilated with a tidal volume ,7–8 ml kg
  • when the pericardium and the chest are open.
The second ‘S’ stands for sustained cardiac arrhythmias. In this setting, PPV and SVV reflect altered cardiacfilling times rather than the effects of mechanical ventilation and then cannot be used to predict fluid responsiveness.

Finally, questions remain regarding the usefulness of dynamic parameters in other clinical situations such as laparoscopic procedures, where they may still be valuable but with different cut-off values.

In conclusion, there are  that limitations to the use of dynamic parameters.
However, this  should not discourage clinicians to use dynamic parameters when they can, and alternative solutions when necessary. Indeed, rational and individualized perioperative fluid strategies are
key to decrease the human and economic burden of postoperative complications.

  1. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 419–28
  2. Marik P, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in Randomized controlled trials in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642–7
  3. Michard F. Volume management using dynamic parameters: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Chest 2005; 128: 1902–3
  4.  Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJAM, et al. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 395–401
  5. Michard F. Stroke volume variation: from applied physiology to improved outcomes. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 402–3





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Things to Avoid in Anesthesia for Pregnant with Pulmonary hypertension

Anesthesia for Pregnant woman with Pulmonary Hypertension is a real challenge for anesthesiologist. It is very crucial to remember the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in pregnant women and to avoid some practices that will worsen the cardiac status. 1-Avoid single shot spinal anesthesia. Some authorities consider pulmonary hypertension as absolute contraindication for single shot spinal anesthesia specially in patients with NYHA III ,IV. Spinal anesthesia causes major hemodynamic instability(decrease SVR, decrease VR, decrease in CO) The preferred neuroaxial techniques are (epidural anesthesia and CSE with minimal spinal dose) 2-Avoid PAC. Pulmonary Artery catheters insertion may lead to pulmonary artery rupture or thrombosis. TEE is better cardiac monitor/Arteial line is mandatory. 3-Avoid Nitrous oxide in gas mixture.N2O increase the PVR 4-If MV to be started, avoid High TV and PEEP 5-Avoid Oxytocin Boluses, or rapid administration of Pitocin. Oxytocin causes ...
Post a Comment
Read more

power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters

Clinical experience with power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters in intensive care patients     Introduction In intensive care units (ICU), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) may be an alternative option to standard central venous catheters, particularly in patients with coagulation disorders or at high risk for infection. Some limits of PICCs (such as low flow rates) may be overcome by the use of power-injectable catheters . Method We have retrospectively reviewed all the power injectable PICCs inserted in adult and pediatric patients in the ICU during a 12-month period, focusing on the rate of complications at insertion and during maintenance. Results We have collected 89 power injectable PICCs (in adults and in children), both multiple and single lumen. All insertions were successful. There were no major complications at insertion and no episodes of catheter-related blood stream infection. Non-infective complications ...
1 comment
Read more

Lumbar and thoracic epidural in Pediatrics-Technical aspect

The midline approach is most commonly used. The ligamentum   flavum is considerably thinner and less dense in infants than in older children and adults. This makes recognition of engagement in the ligament more difficult and requires both extra care and slower, more deliberate passage of the needle to avoid subarachnoid puncture. The angle of approach to the epidural space is slightly more perpendicular to the plane of the back than in older children and adults, owing to the orientation of the spinous   processes in infants and small children. The loss of resistance technique should be used, but only with saline, not air. There are several reports of venous air embolism in infants and children when air was used to test for loss of resistance Use a short (5 cm) 18-gauge Tuohy needle and a 20- or 21-gauge catheter in infants and children. Epidural kits specifically for infants and children are available Maximum of 0.4 mg/kg/hr of bupivacaine after the initial block is estab...
Post a Comment
Read more