Skip to main content

Extubation and the Myth of “Minimal Ventilator Settings”..Part 1

In the Editorial of  February issue of
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Dr Tobin  stated the following:


"At the point of extubation, a clinician needs to ask him or herself two questions:
1) will the patient be able to sustain spontaneous ventilation following tube removal? and
2) will the patient be able to protect his or her airway after extubation?

My focus is solely on the first question.


A patient’s ability to successfully sustain spontaneous ventilation after extubation will depend on the mechanical load on the respiratory system secondary to resistance, elastance, and intrinsic PEEP, and how well a patient’s respiratory muscles can cope with the imposed load.

If there is any reason to fear that a patient might experience respiratory difficulties following extubation, it is incumbent on a physician to try and replicate the conditions that the patient will face after extubation— but to do so before removal of the endotracheal tube.



Some physicians claim that application of pressure support of 5 to 10 cm H2Osimply overcomes the resistance engendered by an endotracheal tube . Thus, if a patient is able to sustain ventilation at this ventilator setting, he or she should be able to breathe without difficulty following extubation.

This claim ignores the inflammation and edema that develops in the upper airways after an endotracheal tube has been in place for a day or more. On removal of the tube, the mucosal swelling produces an increase in upper airway resistance.

Straus and colleagues demonstrated experimentally that the respiratory work dissipated against the supraglottic airway after extubation is almost identicalto the work dissipated against an endotracheal tube before extubation. Thus, applying any level of pressure support causes physicians
to underestimate the respiratory resistance a patient will encounter after extubation.

The addition of a small amount of pressure support produces surprisingly large reductions in inspiratory work in ventilated patients: 5 cm H2O decreases inspiratory work by 31 to 38%, and 10 cm H2O decreases work by 46 to 60% . Nonetheless, most—but not all—patients can tolerate a 30 to 60% increase in inspiratory load at the point of extubation."




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The pressure volume loop...

In the pressure-volume loop below, cardiac work is best represented by:   the area of the curve  the slope of the line from points C to D  the distance of the line from points C to D  the slope of a line from points A to D .. .. ... .... ... .... .... .... In the pressure-volume loop below, cardiac work is best represented by:  the area of the curve Cardiac work is the product of pressure and volume and is linearly related to myocardial oxygen consumption. Cardiac work is best represented by the area of the curve of a pressure-volume loop.
Post a Comment
Read more

Driving Pressure in ARDS: A new concept!

Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Marcelo B.P. Amato, M.D., Maureen O. Meade, M.D., Arthur S. Slutsky, M.D., Laurent Brochard, M.D., Eduardo L.V. Costa, M.D., David A. Schoenfeld, Ph.D., Thomas E. Stewart, M.D., Matthias Briel, M.D., Daniel Talmor, M.D., M.P.H., Alain Mercat, M.D., Jean-Christophe M. Richard, M.D., Carlos R.R. Carvalho, M.D., and Roy G. Brower, M.D. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:747-755 February 19, 2015 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639 BACKGROUND Mechanical-ventilation strategies that use lower end-inspiratory (plateau) airway pressures, lower tidal volumes (V T ), and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs) can improve survival in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the relative importance of each of these components is uncertain. Because respiratory-system compliance (C RS ) is strongly related to the volume of aerated remaining functional lung during disease (termed functional lung size)...
5 comments
Read more

Anaphylaxis updates part 2- Empty Ventricle Syndrome

Patients with anaphylaxis should not suddenly sit, stand, or be placed in the upright position. Instead, they should be placed on the back with their lower extremities elevated or, if they are experiencing respiratory distress or vomiting, they should be placed in a position of comfort with their lower extremities elevated. This accomplishes 2 therapeutic goals: 1) preservation of fluid in the circulation (the central vascular compartment), an important step in managing distributive shock; and 2) prevention of the empty vena cava/empty ventricle syndrome, which can occur within seconds when patients with anaphylaxis suddenly assume or are placed in an upright position. Patients with this syndrome are at high risk for sudden death. They are unlikely to respond to epinephrine regardless of route of administration, because it does not reach the heart and therefore cannot be circulated throughout the body
Post a Comment
Read more