Skip to main content

Local anesthetic toxicity and lipid rescue...



"A Mixed (long- and Medium-chain) Triglyceride Lipid Emulsion Extracts Local Anesthetic from Human Serum In Vitro More Effectively than a Long-chain Emulsion"

Anesthesiology, February 2012




Researchers in the U.K. analyzed the difference between mixed (medium- and long-chain) and long-chain lipid emulsions, for their ability to extract local anesthetic from serum. They concluded that the type of emulsion may make the reversal more effective.


The authors used human drug-free serum and added bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or mepivacaine each at a concentration of 10 µg/ml, or bupivacaine 100 µg/ml at pH 7.4, and, in another experiment, bupivacaine 10 µg at pH 6.9. 20% Intralipid®, which has long-chain triglycerides, or 20% Lipofundin®, which contains a 50-50% mixture of medium- and long-chain triglycerides, was then added at 1, 2, or 4% of total volume. The mean decrease in serum drug concentration was then calculated.

The authors’ in vitro model showed overall that Lipofundin® was significantly better than Intralipid® in extracting the drugs from serum. The relative degree of extraction was bupivacaine > ropivacaine > mepivacaine. This order is consistent with the relative partition constant of each drug. As higher concentrations of either Intralipid® or Lipofundin® were used, the percent decrease of bupivacaine increased and a greater effect was seen with Lipofundin® at each % of lipid. A larger percent decrease in serum bupivacaine was observed after 100 µg/ml bupivacaine compared to 10 µg/ml for both Intralipid® and Lipofundin®, and Lipofundi®n extracted more bupivacaine than Intralipid® at each concentration of either lipid. The effect of pH on sequestering bupivacaine was not significant.

These findings call into question the current advanced cardiac life support guidelines specifying use of a long-chain triglyceride emulsion for lipid rescue, although further in vivo studies that confirm a significant improvement in resuscitation from local anesthetic toxicity with lipofundin are obviously required before drawing any confident conclusions. Also, Lipofundin® is currently commercially unavailable in the United States. Indeed, though the study was performed in the United States, the Lipofundin emulsion that was used was a gift from the manufacturer B. Braun Melsungen AG (Melsungen, Germany)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 100 essentials in icu and anesthesia

The most visual experience in anesthesia and critical care education  The 100 essentials of anesthesia and critical care  COMING VERY SOON  stay tuned 

Driving Pressure in ARDS: A new concept!

Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Marcelo B.P. Amato, M.D., Maureen O. Meade, M.D., Arthur S. Slutsky, M.D., Laurent Brochard, M.D., Eduardo L.V. Costa, M.D., David A. Schoenfeld, Ph.D., Thomas E. Stewart, M.D., Matthias Briel, M.D., Daniel Talmor, M.D., M.P.H., Alain Mercat, M.D., Jean-Christophe M. Richard, M.D., Carlos R.R. Carvalho, M.D., and Roy G. Brower, M.D. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:747-755 February 19, 2015 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639 BACKGROUND Mechanical-ventilation strategies that use lower end-inspiratory (plateau) airway pressures, lower tidal volumes (V T ), and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs) can improve survival in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the relative importance of each of these components is uncertain. Because respiratory-system compliance (C RS ) is strongly related to the volume of aerated remaining functional lung during disease (termed functional lung size)...