Skip to main content

Dopamine...soon will be part of History

Soon Dopamine will be part of history of medicine...

This is because of  two main  reasons:

First, renal sparing low dose dopamine was disproven.

Second two big studies published in 2010 pushed Dopamine  further into darkness

The SOAP II study had 1600 patients and another one printed in Shock had 250 patients.

Both studies randomised patients in shock and in need of vasopressors to either dopamine or noradrenaline. Both made the same conclusion.

There was no significant overall difference in 28-day mortality, but the dopamine group had significantly higher incidence of arrhythmia.

The dopamine sub-group with cardiogenic shock actually did show a higher mortality compared to noradrenaline. Cardiogenic shock is exactly the group where dopamine was recommended by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines.

So as you see Dopamine is suffering to survive...this may not be the end of Dopamine,but for the time being other vasopressors like noradrenaline seems like the safest vasopressor choice in shock patients. Also – or even especially – in cardiogenic shock.


N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):779-89

Shock. 2010 Apr;33(4):375-80:
Labels:

Comments

  1. arunarali144February 26, 2012 at 8:53 AM

    non-catecholamine inotropes are the best bet in cardiogenic shock along with other non-pharmacologic measures to improve preload. don't blame poor dopamine for the mishaps. it's merely poor drug selection. using a combination of dobutamine and noradrenaline may be just as good. even adrenaline works well. but non-catecholamine inotropes are very important in the management of cardiogenic shock. vasopressors only play a supportive role during initial management.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Things to Avoid in Anesthesia for Pregnant with Pulmonary hypertension

Anesthesia for Pregnant woman with Pulmonary Hypertension is a real challenge for anesthesiologist. It is very crucial to remember the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in pregnant women and to avoid some practices that will worsen the cardiac status. 1-Avoid single shot spinal anesthesia. Some authorities consider pulmonary hypertension as absolute contraindication for single shot spinal anesthesia specially in patients with NYHA III ,IV. Spinal anesthesia causes major hemodynamic instability(decrease SVR, decrease VR, decrease in CO) The preferred neuroaxial techniques are (epidural anesthesia and CSE with minimal spinal dose) 2-Avoid PAC. Pulmonary Artery catheters insertion may lead to pulmonary artery rupture or thrombosis. TEE is better cardiac monitor/Arteial line is mandatory. 3-Avoid Nitrous oxide in gas mixture.N2O increase the PVR 4-If MV to be started, avoid High TV and PEEP 5-Avoid Oxytocin Boluses, or rapid administration of Pitocin. Oxytocin causes ...
Post a Comment
Read more

power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters

Clinical experience with power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters in intensive care patients     Introduction In intensive care units (ICU), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) may be an alternative option to standard central venous catheters, particularly in patients with coagulation disorders or at high risk for infection. Some limits of PICCs (such as low flow rates) may be overcome by the use of power-injectable catheters . Method We have retrospectively reviewed all the power injectable PICCs inserted in adult and pediatric patients in the ICU during a 12-month period, focusing on the rate of complications at insertion and during maintenance. Results We have collected 89 power injectable PICCs (in adults and in children), both multiple and single lumen. All insertions were successful. There were no major complications at insertion and no episodes of catheter-related blood stream infection. Non-infective complications ...
1 comment
Read more

Lumbar and thoracic epidural in Pediatrics-Technical aspect

The midline approach is most commonly used. The ligamentum   flavum is considerably thinner and less dense in infants than in older children and adults. This makes recognition of engagement in the ligament more difficult and requires both extra care and slower, more deliberate passage of the needle to avoid subarachnoid puncture. The angle of approach to the epidural space is slightly more perpendicular to the plane of the back than in older children and adults, owing to the orientation of the spinous   processes in infants and small children. The loss of resistance technique should be used, but only with saline, not air. There are several reports of venous air embolism in infants and children when air was used to test for loss of resistance Use a short (5 cm) 18-gauge Tuohy needle and a 20- or 21-gauge catheter in infants and children. Epidural kits specifically for infants and children are available Maximum of 0.4 mg/kg/hr of bupivacaine after the initial block is estab...
Post a Comment
Read more