Skip to main content

Ephedrine and Phenylephrine Use during Cesarean Delivery: Which to choose?

A Review of the Impact of Phenylephrine Administration on Maternal Hemodynamics and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

Ashraf S. Habib, MBBCh, MSc, MHS, FRCA
Anesth Analg 2011


Phenylephrine is effective for the management of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. While ephedrine was previously considered the vasopressor of choice in obstetric patients, phenylephrine is increasingly being used. This is largely due to studies suggesting improved fetal acid base status with the use of phenylephrine as well as the low incidence of hypotension and its related side effects with prophylactic phenylephrine regimens. This review highlights the effects of phenylephrine compared with ephedrine on many important aspects. Here is the conclusion.


Both ephedrine and phenylephrine are effective in managing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension.

Phenylephrine may be associated with a lower incidence of IONV (Intraoperarive Nausea and Vomiting), and higher umbilical artery pH and base excess compared with ephedrine. However, the difference in pH is small and unlikely to be clinically relevant in low-risk deliveries.

Administration of phenylephrine as a prophylactic infusion is more effective in reducing the incidence of hypotension and IONV compared with bolus administration. However, phenylephrine use is associated with a decrease in maternal cardiac output. The clinical significance of this reduction in healthy low-risk parturients is unclear. Studies suggest that such changes do not appear to have any consequences in healthy mothers. The optimum phenylephrine administration regimen is unclear. Studies addressing the use of phenylephrine in high-risk pregnancies, such as those complicated by placental insufficiency, preeclampsia, and growth restriction, are needed.



Labels:

Comments

  1. Ruben CamargoFebruary 10, 2012 at 11:05 AM

    Good morning. i am anesthesia resident in Colombia. I'm searching the full text of this article but i couldn't find it free text. Here the availability of resources to get a paid article are very limited. Is there a way u can help me? mi email is camargoruben@hotmail.com.

    Thanks a lot

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Things to Avoid in Anesthesia for Pregnant with Pulmonary hypertension

Anesthesia for Pregnant woman with Pulmonary Hypertension is a real challenge for anesthesiologist. It is very crucial to remember the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension in pregnant women and to avoid some practices that will worsen the cardiac status. 1-Avoid single shot spinal anesthesia. Some authorities consider pulmonary hypertension as absolute contraindication for single shot spinal anesthesia specially in patients with NYHA III ,IV. Spinal anesthesia causes major hemodynamic instability(decrease SVR, decrease VR, decrease in CO) The preferred neuroaxial techniques are (epidural anesthesia and CSE with minimal spinal dose) 2-Avoid PAC. Pulmonary Artery catheters insertion may lead to pulmonary artery rupture or thrombosis. TEE is better cardiac monitor/Arteial line is mandatory. 3-Avoid Nitrous oxide in gas mixture.N2O increase the PVR 4-If MV to be started, avoid High TV and PEEP 5-Avoid Oxytocin Boluses, or rapid administration of Pitocin. Oxytocin causes ...
Post a Comment
Read more

power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters

Clinical experience with power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters in intensive care patients     Introduction In intensive care units (ICU), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) may be an alternative option to standard central venous catheters, particularly in patients with coagulation disorders or at high risk for infection. Some limits of PICCs (such as low flow rates) may be overcome by the use of power-injectable catheters . Method We have retrospectively reviewed all the power injectable PICCs inserted in adult and pediatric patients in the ICU during a 12-month period, focusing on the rate of complications at insertion and during maintenance. Results We have collected 89 power injectable PICCs (in adults and in children), both multiple and single lumen. All insertions were successful. There were no major complications at insertion and no episodes of catheter-related blood stream infection. Non-infective complications ...
1 comment
Read more

Lumbar and thoracic epidural in Pediatrics-Technical aspect

The midline approach is most commonly used. The ligamentum   flavum is considerably thinner and less dense in infants than in older children and adults. This makes recognition of engagement in the ligament more difficult and requires both extra care and slower, more deliberate passage of the needle to avoid subarachnoid puncture. The angle of approach to the epidural space is slightly more perpendicular to the plane of the back than in older children and adults, owing to the orientation of the spinous   processes in infants and small children. The loss of resistance technique should be used, but only with saline, not air. There are several reports of venous air embolism in infants and children when air was used to test for loss of resistance Use a short (5 cm) 18-gauge Tuohy needle and a 20- or 21-gauge catheter in infants and children. Epidural kits specifically for infants and children are available Maximum of 0.4 mg/kg/hr of bupivacaine after the initial block is estab...
Post a Comment
Read more