Skip to main content

Pancreatitis..fasting,Antibiotics and Surgery..What is new?





This is a kind of Practice changing piece of data in the management of acute Pancreatitis. Here is the summary of updated literature, and it covers the recent updated in the three pillars of acute pancreatitis management

1-feeding..the question is to feed or not?
2-Antibiotics..the question is to give or not?
3-Surgery..the question to do or not?

Here are the answers

Regarding Feeding, the answer is "FEED ", Cochrane review in 2010  reached the conclusion – feed patients. In fact fasting has not been shown to help and probably increases the length of admission.  it is always taught that  feeding can increase enzyme production and cause “auto-digestion” – but according to the recent evidence it just aren’t so – they get better quicker and don’t suffer worse inflammation / mortality etc.  And if you have a nasogastric tube in – then that is fine – it does not need to be a nasojejunal tube to avoid the dreaded enzymes.

Now the second Question, Antibiotics to give or not? The old minded school always propose that acute pancreatitis is a sterile process and no need for antibiotics.
However things change and IV Abs have been used in the severe, necrotic end of the spectrum of disease with some benefit. A meta-analysis in Annals of Surgery suggested a benefit – but it was not an overwhelming one to my reading.  However this review suggested IV meropenem was a good thing for a necrotic collection.

The last question is Shall we take the patient to OR? The short answer is – not initially, a delayed surgical strategy seems to be beneficial. Surgery is probably best reserved for the true necrotic collection (necrosectomy) with a washout.


Evidence-Based Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis
A Look at Established Paradigms
Stefan Heinrich, MD,* Markus Schäfer, MD,* Valentin Rousson, PhD,† and Pierre-Alain Clavien, MD, PhD*
Ann Surg. 2006 February; 243(2): 154–168
\
Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitisMohammed Al-Omran1,*, Zaina H AlBalawi2, Mariam F Tashkandi3, Lubna A Al-Ansary4

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Driving Pressure in ARDS: A new concept!

Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Marcelo B.P. Amato, M.D., Maureen O. Meade, M.D., Arthur S. Slutsky, M.D., Laurent Brochard, M.D., Eduardo L.V. Costa, M.D., David A. Schoenfeld, Ph.D., Thomas E. Stewart, M.D., Matthias Briel, M.D., Daniel Talmor, M.D., M.P.H., Alain Mercat, M.D., Jean-Christophe M. Richard, M.D., Carlos R.R. Carvalho, M.D., and Roy G. Brower, M.D. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:747-755 February 19, 2015 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639 BACKGROUND Mechanical-ventilation strategies that use lower end-inspiratory (plateau) airway pressures, lower tidal volumes (V T ), and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs) can improve survival in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the relative importance of each of these components is uncertain. Because respiratory-system compliance (C RS ) is strongly related to the volume of aerated remaining functional lung during disease (termed functional lung size)...
5 comments
Read more

Anaphylaxis updates part 2- Empty Ventricle Syndrome

Patients with anaphylaxis should not suddenly sit, stand, or be placed in the upright position. Instead, they should be placed on the back with their lower extremities elevated or, if they are experiencing respiratory distress or vomiting, they should be placed in a position of comfort with their lower extremities elevated. This accomplishes 2 therapeutic goals: 1) preservation of fluid in the circulation (the central vascular compartment), an important step in managing distributive shock; and 2) prevention of the empty vena cava/empty ventricle syndrome, which can occur within seconds when patients with anaphylaxis suddenly assume or are placed in an upright position. Patients with this syndrome are at high risk for sudden death. They are unlikely to respond to epinephrine regardless of route of administration, because it does not reach the heart and therefore cannot be circulated throughout the body
Post a Comment
Read more

Epidural catheter tests...not only the test dose

Siphon test The catheter is held upright and a fluid level sought. If the catheter is then elevated, the fluid level should fall (see inset) as the fluid siphons in to the epidural space, which is usually under negative pressure compared with atmospheric. If the fluid column continues to rise, this may suggest subarachnoid placement. The siphon test can be reassuring, but is not mandatory. Aspiration  This should be considered mandatory. The Luer connector is attached to the catheter and a syringe is used to apply negative pressure. Free and continued aspiration of clear fluid can indicate subarachnoid placement of the catheter. However, if saline has been used for loss of resistance, it is not unusual for a small amount of this to be aspirated. If there is doubt, the aspirated fluid can be tested for glucose (cerebrospinal fluid will generally test positive) or mixed with thiopentone (cerebrospinal fluid forms a precipitate). If blood is freely and continuously aspirated, this sug...
Post a Comment
Read more